One of the difficulties in writing about wine is comparisons. When someone describes a wine, and I’m guilty of this as well, they too often look for something to compare it to. This happens because wine writers, and especially in the U.S., have to find a way to adjust the wine they’re writing about to a U.S. drinker’s frame of reference. Hence you’ll see wines that taste nothing like cabernet sauvignon being compared to cabernet, since that’s all we know in this country.
This approach does a tremendous disservice to wines made with unfamiliar grapes from less familiar parts of the world. Case in point is the Castilla (about $14, purchased, available at Central Market), with is a Spanish white wine made with the verdejo grape. The wine is usually compared to sauvignon blanc, when it actually has very little in common with sauvignon blanc.
Yes, each has a citrus flavor, but that’s about it. The Castilla is a much richer, fuller wine, and the finish is almost oak-like (though it doesn’t have any oak aging). The citrus is just one part of its appeal; for most inexpensive sauvignon blancs, citrus is the only appeal. The Castilla is far more complex than most sauvignon blanc at this price, and it pairs with a wider variety of food. In this, it’s an incredible food wine, as all true Spanish wines appear to be.
Click to sign up for the Advocate's weekly news digest and be the first to know what’s happening in Lake Highlands.